Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Query on N1201-8A Network

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Hostboard Member ngccglp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 20th, 2005
    Posts
    148
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Query on N1201-8A Network

    Hi,

    Recently I acquired a VOTT A7-X and the components are 828C/416-8B/511B/802-8G/N1201-8A.

    The N1201-8A is used by the Model 19 which has the 811B, and the 416-8B is not horn loaded.

    On the N1201-8A there are 'OPTIMUM' markings for both the MID and HF LPADS. May I know if these OPTIMUM markings apply to the A7-X as well since the horn and the enclosure are different. More specifically, I would assume the 416-8B in the 828C would have higher sensitivity rating than when its used in the Model 19.

    OR are the N1201-8As used in the A7-X modified to compensate for the different enclosures?

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Senior Hostboard Member bowtie427ss's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 24th, 2006
    Location
    Rural NY
    Posts
    3,901
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    26 Post(s)

    Re: Query on N1201-8A Network

    More specifically, I would assume the 416-8B in the 828C would have higher sensitivity rating than when its used in the Model 19.
    All else being equal(which it seldom is) your assumption is correct. But, we're only talking a few db, and only in the region where where the midbass horn loads the 416 which is from a little above 100hz to a little below 1khz.

    Compared to the Nineteen's LF section, the 828 is going to have a broad hump in the midbass, and roll off more quickly at the extremes of it's range, particularly on the LF end.
    Not all vegetables make good leaders.

  3. #3
    Senior Hostboard Member ngccglp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 20th, 2005
    Posts
    148
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Query on N1201-8A Network

    Quote Originally Posted by bowtie427ss View Post
    All else being equal(which it seldom is) your assumption is correct. But, we're only talking a few db, and only in the region where where the midbass horn loads the 416 which is from a little above 100hz to a little below 1khz.

    Compared to the Nineteen's LF section, the 828 is going to have a broad hump in the midbass, and roll off more quickly at the extremes of it's range, particularly on the LF end.
    Hi Bowtie,

    Thanks. So the perceived mismatch in the low and high levels is really caused by the hump in the 828 enclosure. I played some pink noise and noticed the hump around 200 to 400 hz region. At the crossover point of 1200 hz, the levels were quite even when the Lpads are at the optimum positions. No wonder even when I turned the mid lpad to maximum position it is still not able to match the hump caused by the horn loading. I am not able to get a more tight and clear mid bass because of the hump.

  4. #4
    Senior Hostboard Member GM's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 26th, 2002
    Location
    Chamblee, Ga.
    Posts
    4,967
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    48 Post(s)

    Re: Query on N1201-8A Network

    Yep, the FR of the 416-8B is optimized for the M19 or similar rather than for the A7 series as earlier models were, which had a much elevated ~500 Hz - up break-up modes BW to blend to the mid-bass horn, extending its high eff. response out to around 1600 Hz for an 800 Hz XO point; so ideally an older 416 or even later 421 or 515 is a better choice for the A7 series.

    GM
    Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.

  5. #5
    Senior Hostboard Member ngccglp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 20th, 2005
    Posts
    148
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Query on N1201-8A Network

    Quote Originally Posted by GM View Post
    Yep, the FR of the 416-8B is optimized for the M19 or similar rather than for the A7 series as earlier models were, which had a much elevated ~500 Hz - up break-up modes BW to blend to the mid-bass horn, extending its high eff. response out to around 1600 Hz for an 800 Hz XO point; so ideally an older 416 or even later 421 or 515 is a better choice for the A7 series.

    GM
    Thanks GM.

    Will it help if i biamp, and cross at 500 hz, to level the response around 500 hz between the 511 and 828, and maybe add a simple RC circuit to flatten the response of the 511?

  6. #6
    Senior Hostboard Member GM's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 26th, 2002
    Location
    Chamblee, Ga.
    Posts
    4,967
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    48 Post(s)

    Re: Query on N1201-8A Network

    You're welcome!

    Yes, this is what I wound up doing when the dbx digital EQ, etc., came along and determined that compression horns seem to have a certain synergy with passive contour shaping that I had up to that point taken for granted, so got my 'cake and eat it too' with high power, low output impedance for 'heart attack' fast transients, yet with no obvious digital 'grunge' typical of early SS amps presumably due to the extra series resistance pre-loading the amp up to its working 'sweet spot' that apparently all SS amps have to a greater or lesser extent; though admittedly McIntosh's SS amps with output trannys [2100-2200? series] did the horns best overall, just not enough for me to justify the 'insane' prices after having to sell my prized Porsche to fund the many thousands [in 1980 $$$] required just for the dbx electronics and a then just arrived Mc2500 amp.

    Don't know about equivalent performing amp prices today, but the now crude/low tech dbx electronics are easily bested by mostly freeware these days and with many more features to boot!

    GM
    Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This forum has been viewed: 28131802 times.